Talks License?

Fri Jan 4 00:04:14 CST 2008

thats just wrong, you don't see the eloquence being removed from window eyes 
or jaws. wish they could recreate it.

Nicki

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Arrigo" <n0oxy at charter.net>
To: "The Accessible Phones Discussion List" <blindphones at mosenexplosion.com>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: Talks License?

> Actually, the fact that mobile speak no longer uses eloquence was not the
> fault of code factory, nuance pulled their license, probably because code
> factory competes with a nuance product.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Nicki Lehmann" <comanike at gmail.com>
> To: "The Accessible Phones Discussion List" 
> <blindphones at mosenexplosion.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:30 AM
> Subject: Re: Talks License?
>
>
>> from a perspective of someone who has used both I think talks is better
> but
>> only because these days I love having the ability to surft the web. I was
>> also bitterly disappointed when mobile speak stopped having eloquence as 
>> a
>> speach synth. it would be like saying which is better jaws or window 
>> eyes,
>> depends what you expect from the screen reader and what you want it to 
>> do.
>> Nicki
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "James Scholes" <jamesscholes at msn.com>
>> To: "The Accessible Phones Discussion List"
> <blindphones at mosenexplosion.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 9:00 AM
>> Subject: Re: Talks License?
>>
>>
>> > In my experience, Talks is better than Mobile Speak, but this is 
>> > because
> I
>> > use Talks all of the time, so I am bound to think that Talks is better
> as
>> > it
>> > is what I am used to. However, I use Mobile Speak on an old 2nd 
>> > eddition
>> > phone, and I have to say that it has its good points, and its bad
> points,
>> > but so does Talks. So, what I am trying to say is that we could sit 
>> > here
>> > having a debate for hours on which screen reader is the best, but in 
>> > the
>> > end
>> > it depends on the user and what the user expects from a screen reader,
> or
>> > for that matter, anything in life.
>> >
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------------------
>> > From: "Jonathan Mosen" <jmosen at mosen.org>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 11:56 PM
>> > To: "'The Accessible Phones Discussion List'"
>> > <blindphones at mosenexplosion.com>
>> > Subject: RE: Talk License?
>> >
>> >> The question was is it true,the answer is no.
>> >>
>> >> Jonathan
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: blindphones-bounces at mosenexplosion.com
>> >> [mailto:blindphones-bounces at mosenexplosion.com] On Behalf Of Bob
> Campbell
>> >> Sent: Thursday, 3 January 2008 12:52 p.m.
>> >> To: The Accessible Phones Discussion List
>> >> Subject: Re: Talk License?
>> >>
>> >> I'm confused   by your answer Jonathan.  The question was " Is it true
>> >> that
>> >> Talks is not as efficient for browsing the web as Mobile Speak is?"
>> >> You say" No it isn't since   on simbions Mobile Speak  doesn't support
>> >> any
>> >> browsing on third edition phones at all.
>> >> So Putting it another way,
>> >> Mobile Speak is inferior  and Talks must be better?
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> >> From: "Jonathan Mosen" <jmosen at mosen.org>
>> >> To: "'The Accessible Phones Discussion List'"
>> >> <blindphones at mosenexplosion.com>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 2:31 PM
>> >> Subject: RE: Talk License?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> No it isn't, since on Symbian, Mobile Speak doesn't support any
> browsing
>> >> on
>> >> third edition phones at all. Talks I think has done an outstanding job
>> >> with
>> >> their web support, with features like the ability to move by heading,
>> >> jump
>> >> to non-linked text etc.
>> >>
>> >> Jonathan
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: blindphones-bounces at mosenexplosion.com
>> >> [mailto:blindphones-bounces at mosenexplosion.com] On Behalf Of
> TaraPrakash
>> >> Sent: Thursday, 3 January 2008 9:13 a.m.
>> >> To: The Accessible Phones Discussion List
>> >> Subject: Re: Talk License?
>> >>
>> >> Hi all.
>> >> Is it true that Talks is not as efficient for browsing the net as
>> >> Mobilespeak is?
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> >> From: "Stephen Giggar" <sgiggar at sbcglobal.net>
>> >> To: "The Accessible Phones Discussion List"
>> >> <blindphones at mosenexplosion.com>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 2:50 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: Talk License?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> Fazil
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes you would need to buy a phone transfer license. You need to talk
> to
>> >>> a
>> >>> dealer for current pricing
>> >>> information.
>> >>>
>> >>> Signed: Stephen Giggar
>> >>> sgiggar at sbcglobal.net
>> >>> Skype: dr-phone.
>> >>>
>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> >>> From: "Fazil M." <urdu786 at telus.net>
>> >>> To: "The Accessible Phones Discussion List"
>> >>> <blindphones at mosenexplosion.com>
>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 1:29 PM
>> >>> Subject: Talk License?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hi.
>> >>>> I got my Talk License    back in 2004 for my Nokia3650.  This phone
> is
>> >>>> aging and has begun to have
>> >>>> the usual wear&tear and soon I should be looking for a replacement.
>> >>>> My question is, would I be needing a new Talk License for the new
>> >>>> phone?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ===================
>> >>>> Thanks!
>> >>>> ENQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW WHAT THE HELL YOU DO ALL DAY!
>> >>>>        Mentes quaerentes volunt scire quid in Hadei facias totum
> diem!
>> >>>> You received this message because you subscribed to the Accessible
>> >>>> Phones
>> >>
>> >>>> Discussion List.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If you don't want to receive messages from this list anymore, just
> send
>> >>>> a
>> >>
>> >>>> blank e-mail to:
>> >>>> blindphones-unsubscribe at mosenexplosion.com
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> You received this message because you subscribed to the Accessible
>> >>> Phones
>> >>> Discussion List.
>> >>>
>> >>> If you don't want to receive messages from this list anymore, just
> send
>> >>> a
>> >>> blank e-mail to:
>> >>> blindphones-unsubscribe at mosenexplosion.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You received this message because you subscribed to the Accessible
> Phones
>> >> Discussion List.
>> >>
>> >> If you don't want to receive messages from this list anymore, just 
>> >> send
> a
>> >> blank e-mail to:
>> >> blindphones-unsubscribe at mosenexplosion.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You received this message because you subscribed to the Accessible
> Phones
>> >> Discussion List.
>> >>
>> >> If you don't want to receive messages from this list anymore, just 
>> >> send
> a
>> >> blank e-mail to:
>> >> blindphones-unsubscribe at mosenexplosion.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You received this message because you subscribed to the Accessible
> Phones
>> >> Discussion List.
>> >>
>> >> If you don't want to receive messages from this list anymore, just 
>> >> send
> a
>> >> blank e-mail to:
>> >> blindphones-unsubscribe at mosenexplosion.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You received this message because you subscribed to the Accessible
> Phones
>> >> Discussion List.
>> >>
>> >> If you don't want to receive messages from this list anymore, just 
>> >> send
> a
>> >> blank e-mail to:
>> >> blindphones-unsubscribe at mosenexplosion.com
>> >>
>> >
>> > You received this message because you subscribed to the Accessible
> Phones
>> > Discussion List.
>> >
>> > If you don't want to receive messages from this list anymore, just send
> a
>> > blank e-mail to:
>> > blindphones-unsubscribe at mosenexplosion.com
>>
>>
>> You received this message because you subscribed to the Accessible Phones
> Discussion List.
>>
>> If you don't want to receive messages from this list anymore, just send a
> blank e-mail to:
>> blindphones-unsubscribe at mosenexplosion.com
>>
>
>
> You received this message because you subscribed to the Accessible Phones 
> Discussion List.
>
> If you don't want to receive messages from this list anymore, just send a 
> blank e-mail to:
> blindphones-unsubscribe at mosenexplosion.com
> 